Re: [Privacy-pass] Working group last Call for batched Tokens

Raphael Robert <ietf@raphaelrobert.com> Mon, 08 April 2024 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@raphaelrobert.com>
X-Original-To: privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C945C15107A for <privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 12:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=raphaelrobert.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kUyuMuHHZXTA for <privacy-pass@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 12:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69511C14F6E2 for <privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2024 12:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a4702457ccbso631610166b.3 for <privacy-pass@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Apr 2024 12:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raphaelrobert.com; s=rr; t=1712604237; x=1713209037; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8bDrcmDcXCXkF72nTmLhYNMTC9b5TgLYsmwU5+fYYBg=; b=fjb8jf4t3qW3PNh6zPQx4lziOdTry5GQiNfcjkpU8vF82M0IYQOHQscrmjB2ETYfmb myN0AHHg3c7dShDddjHlraYLNMVhwSWwwHCGk+CK6GzwaT1gKcCMh4+cKqZyP/arAaq9 IzhwElKawZs/y//RvssjSgdOtvw+lvLINIWHg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712604237; x=1713209037; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=8bDrcmDcXCXkF72nTmLhYNMTC9b5TgLYsmwU5+fYYBg=; b=gugY9D1FG8mspRdXBIcc7Vnq0h8QiSZCelDs/rVYoDKUya1VUoj6W8ixCPaut6E+ad 6SThRFvIj+ZXtKIdaS3KDeIf2NCnFm0TJK01Wa3iQj1B1rSMLJjlZvlk5VdP9aBOjttd 3bqequScdqlnl9NIGVjj82vYgZXQE84Idn4VyqtMtuQyS7c85y1O5ZGYLAaAI6/Nc5JB Q3q4qGOmn6q2MOgHDRlf2Vz7NOU4PjdPJcL2GAeMKrrz2iF0cJSmBJeJ7JQjFvXkFuV9 ZeICBRiKaUtI1ig5JISszVCWGOKUOlpsxvo2ZE8Cam0KTtHrUZsi5/eiTeErUWgP2tmT psfA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV1g3LFbuDoeerzv9XD7PX6hUj9IE7XiN3Y2GWuQ4fcDOd2g4JtGUiODgSNZdPBpxBRoDlhwihT9TyTNo5M+0lTaL9wwNw=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxtbmpAihbaqbZRrayf/+Uv1XiYXy1Wy8fJTS30sOJQFl9mjb3S vaYbeHLEQQxqURp6s6lJbwfKGfbMCiaueygD8LVvp3N7Opl5yeM2m8IiPdadpoSQVdjpBOjzGAW M0K0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEznLhhNPX0EZx6Mjl+YEfR/UA+dk7Mf7p4FDzagjxH+NqgqTLsdoVt/2l5Jirf+TCz0STP/g==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7b89:b0:a51:9d99:78ae with SMTP id ne9-20020a1709077b8900b00a519d9978aemr7814526ejc.67.1712604237182; Mon, 08 Apr 2024 12:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2a02:8109:9f19:7000:45a6:a892:1d9e:3136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id er16-20020a170907739000b00a51cdde5d9bsm2402568ejc.225.2024.04.08.12.23.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Apr 2024 12:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Raphael Robert <ietf@raphaelrobert.com>
Message-Id: <0B02D7EA-1045-43BC-A486-16433FAC25F5@raphaelrobert.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5D9D8499-BAB3-4540-A82E-426C8E9C3A01"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 21:23:51 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAOgPGoCzLNv+7HnuoqMCmyEq7LtV7UYTBejSsgeJ7Sb8iH=6yA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Valdez <svaldez=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, privacy-pass@ietf.org
To: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
References: <CAOgPGoDiW2XgOGkv_ug=TFP=BNJG=SffJVcE8zCnv4cXvudYsw@mail.gmail.com> <CANduzxAPCDhvqV3jOYXiYywLok4g+i5KZw=p=fnszKwuGEw4bw@mail.gmail.com> <113031C1-BD70-402A-9247-20016C5BDE9A@raphaelrobert.com> <CAOgPGoCzLNv+7HnuoqMCmyEq7LtV7UYTBejSsgeJ7Sb8iH=6yA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/privacy-pass/dPUtovraONumoBsiFfJIumNGPRc>
Subject: Re: [Privacy-pass] Working group last Call for batched Tokens
X-BeenThere: privacy-pass@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Privacy Pass Protocol <privacy-pass.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/privacy-pass>, <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/privacy-pass/>
List-Post: <mailto:privacy-pass@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass>, <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 19:24:04 -0000

Hi all,

I just published draft-ietf-privacypass-batched-tokens-01.

The two changes are:

 - Add support for P-384 variant besides the ristretto255 variant
 - Align the terminology with the base spec

One question to the WG: The code points for the token type registry in the base spec are 0x001 & 0x002, draft-ietf-privacypass-rate-limit-tokens follows with 0x003 & 0x004. Should we continue the progression and ask for 0x005 & 0x006 for draft-ietf-privacypass-batched-tokens?

Thanks

Raphael

> On 8. Apr 2024, at 06:02, Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> wrote:
> 
> RIght now we only have one response to the last call which is not enough to call consensus on.   It would be good to have a draft that is not expired, but I also think before we can continue a consensus call we need a draft with all the outstanding changes as well.  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joe
> 
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 3:37 AM Raphael Robert <ietf@raphaelrobert.com <mailto:ietf@raphaelrobert.com>> wrote:
>> As soon as that issue is resolved I’ll make one more editorial pass before I cut a new draft. I’ll announce it here.
>> 
>> Raphael
>> 
>>> On 20. Mar 2024, at 06:23, Steven Valdez <svaldez=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I think this draft looks mostly good and I support it going to the IESG. There is one outstanding issue #6 <https://github.com/ietf-wg-privacypass/ietf-draft-privacypass-batched-tokens/issues/6> (I submitted and forgot to follow up on) regarding adding the VOPRF variant as a defined type since we're relying on that variant for PST. I can try to get a PR for that submitted, though not sure what the ordering between the draft being expired, the WGLC and cutting a new draft should look like?
>>> 
>>> -Steven
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 2:47 PM Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net <mailto:joe@salowey.net>> wrote:
>>>> This is the working group last call for Batched Token Issuance Protocol (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-privacypass-batched-tokens/).  Please review the document and indicate if it is ready to forward to the IESG by posting comments to this thread.  The internet draft is about to expire but should still be accessible.  Please send your comments by March 26, 2024.  
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Joe and Ben
>>>> -- 
>>>> Privacy-pass mailing list
>>>> Privacy-pass@ietf.org <mailto:Privacy-pass@ietf.org>
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>>  Steven Valdez |	 Chrome Privacy Sandbox |	 svaldez@google.com <mailto:svaldez@google.com> |	 Cambridge, MA
>>> -- 
>>> Privacy-pass mailing list
>>> Privacy-pass@ietf.org <mailto:Privacy-pass@ietf.org>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/privacy-pass
>>