IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Privacy-pass] Re: The PRIVACYPASS WG has placed draft-hendrickson-privacypass-expiration-extension in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 08 May 2025 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: privacy-pass@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: privacy-pass@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C38267FA03; Thu, 8 May 2025 10:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I3J1tO_cZe68; Thu, 8 May 2025 10:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7D5E267F9FC; Thu, 8 May 2025 10:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ac3b12e8518so253853666b.0; Thu, 08 May 2025 10:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1746725123; x=1747329923; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rP3cC928BfUvJuXL1BCQwXqc4lKfwsG2zKmkY53kUqY=; b=Gtn1n2MOo+VfChf+hTo1xr4BH0QsgrfyLYSvXPBJqeeO5TRmCjmZ13DLD91+yvP+LD YojGtwsebLmRP2XjOODojsKL/S3kVIhUCcogYd7HZU44KdG8U0y2r3rChC8fafqE4BAE CFrQmVzptTHmqQp75bGlyKZ8iPFVeA6JWbqrctNqwfuktJUlAS0AjfCLs7hWy5UQpNDe RaQ7vNiECPlPqFRy1VjiEaRTosDGsUTwszW+D8yd+g3S6W0cy3GlB6zeQwQE3nqUFGmi qiMCSsj89G2GSXXVt8PoD1Nla8F5uIisGexHbVnXIbPi76x2eZ+J+ASCll5CZfZ46NbN HiAQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1746725123; x=1747329923; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=rP3cC928BfUvJuXL1BCQwXqc4lKfwsG2zKmkY53kUqY=; b=e/6sQTa19akOhJDs0V+o7kcUmVskbslRTFHpisnzm7g0w6bme+OtpWzSWAGBHt0v8R O+4Zo6FIPqmTlCx3ULTrhMl0fbDX3arrD+mDSnsKJFHZENc5fPg0EvWAKfxFXSMu0AQL JiTVF4nL4g/LUJ0kd9BD9UrsJPK9nFRI/O4FDhP+bh2Yp6JFI+iIS9xLTRAQQH9pfxZk bQd4leDQWZiCekhG2siz7kC/dMy0SvpzoVQyIBXvNFBKA400pD4ef/MbS35fGGYzkazp gWbmwFgHpfDZUP4JS1HXxN/I/P1GtF2ZHhxaNq1xhZ9Nhlev6B2ZMb4MYOFWxHHCfx1I GeCA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVVgVwC7QpgNf24/4Vy0u+npZJuk1ijKN2sUalE15RZ8U+H2KCJC/HbjDPyYUa2LOqEddvSRD/2pevHJG4e3qBN8FFq7U3w8i1fa6zsLUCvjzquqID2k5OJ95xLrl59iV5NLg==@ietf.org, AJvYcCWAZHW1YKb7pGshCWK4nDrIZzCyw6mULZhMCEgxh1pXjl5+qF1WPgUCKA1491j4nSI8bywNv5ziyMpIqqUJ2/NR2Euo@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyuPATjaT7ZSFaaUpH8jBRipDhIrZPc+nprDLuo1j9DKL/EHWis /kHuoadoIK7SX2q19qOrmubFnGsIVFm308ZHf8jZOu1+pxQPPF/R0DoCZlp5/SFqQHmjt0oddu+ bbWIqpeszjKvx+urHL8CvYfnlW0+QHg==
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctqdT0L3erXwNrKkETOxI+ewYG+OwlZV+RugxCsDsRrs8NiFKC4hr5FxS6ycWl nDeif/Sm4Mo6XVjD2GQSBMn6GN9PnxbnTllg9J0IGaH/km3xVPNDmCNP+pfpqPwPgqquLcW32Uq 8moLUQ1PdrO8yG4gTRVFs/XWYWdOBH9Us4FaCOAwCNfm+Fe0kJs2Vm
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHEO5sCS+PJuTU/p3jrIwOIWHs91GJklzuuk2aP3JB2pk0OEhkh+ouIezXbS7A+o1e9JLTEJbyft8nx2H3iHx4=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c102:b0:ad1:fb26:7a16 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-ad21917066bmr45558766b.45.1746725122376; Thu, 08 May 2025 10:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <174119830325.841458.9017713410598379071@dt-datatracker-5dd67b77bb-4k4zh> <SA1PR15MB43702B17C420CD11E9D31109B38D2@SA1PR15MB4370.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <CACsn0cnojbg_BZ93FxuLjRzjR=Bj59160+-kdX6_XQRL3ca-Jg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0cnojbg_BZ93FxuLjRzjR=Bj59160+-kdX6_XQRL3ca-Jg@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 10:25:10 -0700
X-Gm-Features: ATxdqUEka-AtPuaLsniVpyODSNgdLOlkrECzrA8XtxL2Viavli1_S8KkOWAyryU
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+7AfWdWM1-a4j9gZ_1tP0Dz=mbHtJwQEkbetjwqUySeWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "privacy-pass@ietf.org" <privacy-pass@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000708a070634a3221b"
Message-ID-Hash: BBLRA2GJ2JEJK6UQWOV5R4RKLM6BLD7C
X-Message-ID-Hash: BBLRA2GJ2JEJK6UQWOV5R4RKLM6BLD7C
X-MailFrom: dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>, "draft-hendrickson-privacypass-expiration-extension@ietf.org" <draft-hendrickson-privacypass-expiration-extension@ietf.org>, "privacypass-chairs@ietf.org" <privacypass-chairs@ietf.org>, Ben Schwartz <bemasc@meta.com>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Privacy-pass] Re: The PRIVACYPASS WG has placed draft-hendrickson-privacypass-expiration-extension in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
List-Id: Privacy Pass Protocol <privacy-pass.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/privacy-pass/8ia1QSCUIZSfWC4CHW6hJ8NBMLs>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/privacy-pass>
List-Help: <mailto:privacy-pass-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:privacy-pass-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:privacy-pass@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:privacy-pass-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:privacy-pass-leave@ietf.org>

I also support adoption. We're using this extension in production as part
of Google's deployment of MASQUE proxies. It is absolutely critical for us
- our token lifetimes are quite low, which means that we can't use Apple's
technique of using key rotation for expiry.

David

PS: +1 to actually emailing the list to ask for adoption, I don't read
automated state change emails

On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 5:05 PM Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote:

> I support adoption.
>
> As for the question of mothballing there has been considerable
> activity offlist, and I think there will be a round of drafts and
> proposals once we finish sorting out the underlying way to unfiy all
> of it.
>
>
>
> --
> Astra mortemque praestare gradatim
>
> --
> Privacy-pass mailing list -- privacy-pass@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to privacy-pass-leave@ietf.org
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status