IETF Logo Mail Archive

[proto-team] Appeal point [Re: One more spin of draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding]

Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Tue, 30 January 2007 16:19 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HBvi2-0003iZ-3n; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:19:50 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HBvi0-0003iT-I4 for proto-team@ietf.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:19:48 -0500
Received: from mtagate7.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.140]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HBvhx-0000ej-4h for proto-team@ietf.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:19:48 -0500
Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate7.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0UGJiH8160272 for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:19:44 GMT
Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.228]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.2) with ESMTP id l0UGJiZ91114238 for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:19:44 GMT
Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l0UGJhlc030528 for <proto-team@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:19:43 GMT
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0UGJhT2030508; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:19:43 GMT
Received: from [9.4.210.11] ([9.4.210.11]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA302552; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:19:42 +0100
Message-ID: <45BF701E.1040901@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:19:42 +0100
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
References: <455D83A7.4080708@zurich.ibm.com> <5A835EB1-7C38-4F19-A378-1290D06F59A7@nokia.com> <45BF63F2.2070303@zurich.ibm.com> <B976C55D-18C3-4B9D-9E22-978265E1A31E@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <B976C55D-18C3-4B9D-9E22-978265E1A31E@nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc: David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net>, Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>, proto-team@ietf.org, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>
Subject: [proto-team] Appeal point [Re: One more spin of draft-ietf-proto-wgchair-doc-shepherding]
X-BeenThere: proto-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Process and Tools Team <proto-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>, <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:proto-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team>, <mailto:proto-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: proto-team-bounces@ietf.org

> 
>>>   - Sam and Cullen thinking that the appeals stuff in step 3.h is too much
> 
> I think Sam has a point. When appeals come into the picture, the AD needs to take over. What do others think? 

In fact the 2026 appeal process is clear that the first step is the WG Chair,
the second step is the AD, and third step is the IESG as a whole.

We'd better be certain that this draft doesn't change that. Maybe a simple
mention that the appeal process exists is sufficient. We certainly
don't want to encourage appeals as a normal thing.

     Bfrian

_______________________________________________
proto-team mailing list
proto-team@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/proto-team

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email