IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [provreg] [eppext] Inconsistency in number of status values in draft-tan-epp-launchphase-12 ?

Gavin Brown <gavin.brown@centralnic.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <gavin.brown@centralnic.com>
X-Original-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD631A01D8; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 08:26:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wld5uNBKpuZT; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 08:26:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.centralnic.com (smtp.centralnic.com [193.105.170.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0151A00E9; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 08:26:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CNIC-MBP-200117.local (unknown [2.123.100.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.centralnic.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 177B57203A4; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 16:26:30 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <53175035.3010102@centralnic.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 16:26:29 +0000
From: Gavin Brown <gavin.brown@centralnic.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Gould, James" <JGould@verisign.com>, Patrick Mevzek <Patrick.Mevzek@afnic.fr>, "provreg@ietf.org" <provreg@ietf.org>
References: <CF3CAD62.58C04%jgould@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF3CAD62.58C04%jgould@verisign.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="S2McwMVTQNKx4uNweWae5PSk1wglVb7UO"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/provreg/486yRd2RhfMsXD9o5kPH9IWw9K8
Cc: "eppext@ietf.org" <eppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [provreg] [eppext] Inconsistency in number of status values in draft-tan-epp-launchphase-12 ?
X-BeenThere: provreg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPP discussion list <provreg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/provreg/>
List-Post: <mailto:provreg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 16:26:37 -0000

+1. Our implementation only supports a single status. Are there any
implementations which require this design?

I'll add this point to my slides for discussion tomorrow.

G.

On 05/03/2014 15:36, Gould, James wrote:
> Patrick,
> 
> Good catch. My recommendation is for the text to be tightened up to
> support only a single status, since the status really reflects the status
> or state within the state diagram of Figure 1.  Adding support for
> multiple statuses in the XML schema would make it more difficult for the
> client to determine the state of the application. Thoughts?
> 

-- 
Gavin Brown
Chief Technology Officer
CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC)
Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry Services
for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries
https://www.centralnic.com/

CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with
company
number 8576358. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6AR.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email