[provreg] Inconsistency in number of status values in draft-tan-epp-launchphase-12 ?
Patrick Mevzek <Patrick.Mevzek@afnic.fr> Wed, 05 March 2014 15:23 UTC
Return-Path: <Patrick.Mevzek@afnic.fr>
X-Original-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: provreg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7411A06F2 for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 07:23:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id obqmEwz6dXcZ for <provreg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 07:23:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77A01A06F7 for <provreg@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 07:23:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id C162B2806CF for <provreg@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 16:23:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD73E2806C9 for <provreg@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 16:23:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:96] (citrine.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:96]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DBBB38038; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 16:23:08 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <1394032988.26535.58.camel@citrine>
From: Patrick Mevzek <Patrick.Mevzek@afnic.fr>
To: "provreg@ietf.org" <provreg@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 16:23:08 +0100
Organization: AFNIC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/provreg/gc2ITXHC9HL6KFQZ8A49W3-wz2c
Subject: [provreg] Inconsistency in number of status values in draft-tan-epp-launchphase-12 ?
X-BeenThere: provreg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPP discussion list <provreg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/provreg/>
List-Post: <mailto:provreg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/provreg>, <mailto:provreg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:23:45 -0000
Hello, the text says : Certain status values MAY be combined. For example, an application or registration may be both "invalid" and "rejected" the schema says : <complexType name="infDataType"> <sequence> <element name="phase" type="launch:phaseType"/> <element name="applicationID" type="launch:applicationIDType" minOccurs="0"/> <element name="status" type="launch:statusType" minOccurs="0"/> so maybe a maxOccurs="unbounded" should be added there ? or maxOccurs="7" to be extra conservative ? -- Patrick Mevzek
- [provreg] Inconsistency in number of status value… Patrick Mevzek
- Re: [provreg] Inconsistency in number of status v… Gould, James
- Re: [provreg] [eppext] Inconsistency in number of… Gavin Brown
- Re: [provreg] [eppext] Inconsistency in number of… Mike O
- Re: [provreg] [eppext] Inconsistency in number of… Wil Tan