[PWE3] BFD for MPLS PWs

"Yaakov Stein" <yaakov_s@rad.com> Mon, 31 July 2006 15:00 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7ZFT-0006SK-Cy; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:00:03 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7ZFR-0006SC-OJ for pwe3@ietf.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:00:01 -0400
Received: from [212.199.240.1] (helo=antivir1.rad.co.il) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G7ZFN-0002l9-7z for pwe3@ietf.org; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:00:01 -0400
Received: from antivir1.rad.co.il (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivir1.rad.co.il (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k6VErplK000138 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:53:51 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from exrad3.ad.rad.co.il (exrad2 [192.114.24.112]) by antivir1.rad.co.il (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k6VErodn000134; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:53:50 +0300 (IDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 18:02:01 +0200
Message-ID: <457D36D9D89B5B47BC06DA869B1C815D014D047B@exrad3.ad.rad.co.il>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: BFD for MPLS PWs
Thread-Index: Aca0uqiPUr7dH45NTgmrrj0le7Q+vw==
From: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
To: rahul@juniper.net, pwe3@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
Cc:
Subject: [PWE3] BFD for MPLS PWs
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org

Rahul, 
 
At the PWE session you stated that the MPLS BFD draft
described the use of BFD for PWs, and that the VCCV draft
and the BFD MPLS draft need to remain aligned.
 
The only mention I find in draft draft-ietf-bfd-mpls-03.txt of PWs
is the following motivational text:
 
   2. MPLS Pseudo Wires (PW). Fast detection may be desired for MPLS
   PWs depending on i) the model used to layer the MPLS network with the
   layer 2 network. and ii) the service that the PW is emulating. For a
   non-overlay model between the layer 2 network and the MPLS network
   the provider may rely on PW fault detection to provide service status
   to the end-systems. Also in that case interworking scenarios such as
   ATM/Frame Relay interworking may force periodic PW fault detection
   messages. Depending on the requirements of the service that the MPLS
   PW is emulating, fast failure detection may be desirable. Use of BFD
   for PWs is further described in [VCCV] and [OAM-MAP].

I don't see any normative text here, and certainly nothing describing
whether or not UDP is used. What I do see is a pointer to VCCV,
so that any changes in VCCV should reflect here.

Section 4 on "theory of operation" seems to be silent on PW issues.

Am I missing something?

Y(J)S


_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3