Re: [PWE3] Posting of IPR Disclosure related to Cisco's Statement of IPR relating to draft-ietf-pwe3-oam-msg-map-12

"Dean Willis" <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Thu, 15 April 2010 04:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345E728C1DA; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z+TRVSHNtpEZ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nylon.softarmor.com (nylon.softarmor.com [66.135.38.164]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871BA3A6B2E; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.18.58.79] (mobile-032-162-240-236.mycingular.net [32.162.240.236] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by nylon.softarmor.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id o3F4KHMt002452 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:20:23 -0500
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:20:08 -0400
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
To: steve.trowbridge@alcatel-lucent.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: LCG ProfiMail
Message-ID: <7230009894.955758008@softarmor.com>
In-Reply-To: <DDAC0B1C1542D84EAB431B8FE6FCC1CA24F956AE19@USNAVSXCHMBSA3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:23:48 -0700
Cc: yaakov_s@rad.com, peter.busschbach@alcatel-lucent.com, lmartini@cisco.com, pwe3@ietf.org, ietf-ipr@ietf.org, IETF@core3.amsl.com, mustapha.aissaoui@alcatel-lucent.com, stbryant@cisco.com, andrew.g.malis@verizon.com, adrian.farrel@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Posting of IPR Disclosure related to Cisco's Statement of IPR relating to draft-ietf-pwe3-oam-msg-map-12
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 04:22:51 -0000

This was more a discussion of scope than validity.

Of course, having public discourse in a community of experts that 
disparrages the validity of a claim could bolster invalidation arguments. 
So I can see how this might be a disavored act in the IEEE community, which 
seems to be slanted towards rights holders (I speak as a long-term member 
of IEEE and as a consultant on IPR). Perhaps we'd all be better off if the 
IEEE were a little more critical of misguided claims? Regular raising of a 
hue and cry of "Bullshit!" would go a long way towards reducing the damage 
caused by unmerited patents.
 
--
Dean Willis

------- Original message -------
> From: Trowbridge, Stephen J (Steve) <steve.trowbridge@alcatel-lucent.com>
> Cc: ietf-ipr@ietf.org, pwe3@ietf.org, adrian.farrel@huawei.com, 
> IETF@core3.amsl.com, andrew.g.malis@verizon.com, stbryant@cisco.com
> Sent: 14.4.'10,  8:47
>
> Hi all,
> In IEEE we are admonished to never discuss the essentiality or validity 
> of patent claims. I cannot believe this is considered an appropriate 
> discussion in IETF.
> Regards,
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
> Yaakov Stein
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:44 AM
> To: mmorrow@cisco.com; lmartini@cisco.com; tom.nadeau@bt.com; Aissaoui, 
> Mustapha (Mustapha); david.i.allan@ericsson.com; Busschbach, Peter B 
> (Peter)
> Cc: IETF@core3.amsl.com; Secretariat; pwe3@ietf.org; 
> adrian.farrel@huawei.com; andrew.g.malis@verizon.com; stbryant@cisco.com
> Subject: Re: [PWE3] Posting of IPR Disclosure related to Cisco's 
> Statement of IPR relating to draft-ietf-pwe3-oam-msg-map-12
>
>
> This disclosure (1311) quotes application US20080089227A1: Protecting 
> multi-segment pseudowires which may impact draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy, and 
> perhaps ICCP, MS-PW architecture, and MS-PW setup.
> There is no apparent connection with oam-msg-map - in fact the claims 
> stress that the triggers are failures of PSN elements (e.g. S-PEs) and are 
> NOT from the ACs, making any connection untenable.
>
> A previous disclosure by the same company (863) refers to
>     20080285466 : Interworking between MPLS/IP and Ethernet OAM 
> mechanisms which may impact mpls-eth-oam-iwk, but not oam-msg-map, unless 
> one interprets the first claim and its dependents much more broadly than 
> supported by the background and description.
>
> Can someone from the company claiming this IPR fix the information in 
> these disclosures ?
> At very least that company is required to disclose IPR is holds with 
> respect to the appropriate drafts (unless it is willing to risk forfeiting 
> its rights with respect to these ...).
>
> However, with respect to oam-msg-map I would like to request that it 
> consider removing inappropriate disclosures.
> Of course, if after consideration it believes that these disclosures ARE 
> appropriate, I would love to hear the reasoning.
>
> Y(J)S
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IETF Secretariat [mailto:ietf-ipr@ietf.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 18:46
> To: mmorrow@cisco.com; Yaakov Stein; lmartini@cisco.com; 
> tom.nadeau@bt.com; Mustapha.aissaoui@Alcatel-lucent.com; 
> david.i.allan@ericsson.com; busschbach@alcatel-lucent.com
> Cc: stbryant@cisco.com; adrian.farrel@huawei.com; pwe3@ietf.org; 
> andrew.g.malis@verizon.com; matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com; 
> ipr-announce@ietf.org
> Subject: Posting of IPR Disclosure related to Cisco's Statement of IPR 
> relating to draft-ietf-pwe3-oam-msg-map-12
>
> Dear Monique Morrow, Yaakov Stein, Luca Martini, Thomas Nadeau, Mustapha 
> Aissaoui, David Allan, Peter Busschbach:
>
> An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled 
> "Pseudowire (PW) OAM Message Mapping" (draft-ietf-pwe3-oam-msg-map) was 
> submitted to the IETF Secretariat on 2010-04-07 and has been posted on the 
> "IETF Page of Intellectual Property Rights Disclosures" 
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1311/). The title of the IPR disclosure 
> is "Cisco's Statement of IPR relating to draft-ietf-pwe3-oam-msg-map-12."
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>