Re: [PWE3] Draft liaison to ITU-T SG15 Q9, Q11, Q12 and Q13 regarding draft-manhoudt-pwe3-tsop-01.txt

Hi Andy,

Before sending this Liaison to ITU, did you ask whether there is enough support in PWE3 to progress this draft? 

I personally am not in favor of progressing this draft , since it is for a very specific Scenario with very little use. We already have an RFC for Sonet/SDH CES and I don't think we yet need another one.

Regards,
Shahram

On Aug 15, 2012, at 6:07 AM, "Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com> wrote:

> PWE3ers,
> 
> As a result of the discussion in Vancouver, this is the body of a
> liaison we will be sending to ITU-T SG15 Q9, Q11, Q12 and Q13
> regarding draft-manhoudt-pwe3-tsop-01.txt. Please respond with any
> comments on the liaison. Since the next SG15 meeting is coming up, we
> would like to get this liaison sent soon, so please respond within the
> next few days.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andy
> 
> ------------
> 
> Please find attached draft-manhoudt-pwe3-tsop-01.txt (Transparent
> SDH/SONET over Packet). This is an individual draft submitted to the
> PWE3 working group to propose a new structure-agnostic pseudowire
> encapsulation for SONET/SDH client signals, as opposed to RFC 4842
> (SONET/SDH Circuit Emulation over Packet), which is structure-aware.
> Before the PWE3 WG decides whether to progress with this work, we
> would very much appreciate SG15's opinion regarding the correctness of
> the draft's technical approach, its suitability for standardization in
> the IETF, and whether it unnecessarily duplicates the functionality of
> RFC 4842.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Andrew G. Malis
> Matthew Bocci
> PWE3 Working Group Chairs
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> 