IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] Draft liaison to ITU-T SG15 Q9, Q11, Q12 and Q13 regarding draft-manhoudt-pwe3-tsop-01.txt

"Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com> Wed, 15 August 2012 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <amalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED4E21F87E1 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.184
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.184 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.185, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_33=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uw9dxrdr00ri for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E963221F87DE for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so2567069obb.31 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=QDn/F/EeJLYFHVY+8lu8eChpk9FRyKe2fNiBh2HU3xI=; b=Gw7XGWgKP7Xp9cKx+4sH3ZhWiaxUZoZ1ULQAdS2lEf94FgTpebVm9Q2oWwU0Fu+pWe XEp+j9P48/rCHqAGX407gCaWEO/P1lPgsstS9a0ZunVJT/ApednBCaRcUH5BsyH07JW+ wnizYg04pIphhFmYRL95w53aDdNJd0UDsX8dbfecreRtFbK9gTwz5uU+NbNgyyDZMqiq Tb72+Khl/BvXcr1vlNo3rwGgl8bCjgpXN6oJLbNhi4vcQKwSGJaKmnQA6FAAX26JS2sh m/w/qHybGQmGFvxeaodJGtz3qHVHu6h3tRoZFwHXgyO8CZmtD/fNvZI1y+uA/tcOaPMi RC6w==
Received: by 10.182.226.104 with SMTP id rr8mr24310570obc.41.1345041449598; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.96.177 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DC1D14BD-0990-42C0-B80E-DC1D54E77C55@broadcom.com>
References: <CAK+d4xtX5HXv1=2hB5ZBZhcMamVQHPi=i7-dsW_YJJWy02Z82A@mail.gmail.com> <DC1D14BD-0990-42C0-B80E-DC1D54E77C55@broadcom.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:37:09 -0400
Message-ID: <CAK+d4xtOOfDufN84vZpAGKth0dDnTA_4YqRRXjsaj-B6oy2pPA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Shahram Davari <davari@broadcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] Draft liaison to ITU-T SG15 Q9, Q11, Q12 and Q13 regarding draft-manhoudt-pwe3-tsop-01.txt
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:37:30 -0000

Shahram,

Thanks, and indeed, we have not yet called for a WG consensus on this
draft. The primary reason for sending the liaison is to use SG15's
reply to assist the WG in making a decision on whether to progress the
draft. More information is better than less.

Cheers,
Andy

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Shahram Davari <davari@broadcom.com> wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Before sending this Liaison to ITU, did you ask whether there is enough support in PWE3 to progress this draft?
>
> I personally am not in favor of progressing this draft , since it is for a very specific Scenario with very little use. We already have an RFC for Sonet/SDH CES and I don't think we yet need another one.
>
> Regards,
> Shahram
>
>
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 6:07 AM, "Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> PWE3ers,
>>
>> As a result of the discussion in Vancouver, this is the body of a
>> liaison we will be sending to ITU-T SG15 Q9, Q11, Q12 and Q13
>> regarding draft-manhoudt-pwe3-tsop-01.txt. Please respond with any
>> comments on the liaison. Since the next SG15 meeting is coming up, we
>> would like to get this liaison sent soon, so please respond within the
>> next few days.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andy
>>
>> ------------
>>
>> Please find attached draft-manhoudt-pwe3-tsop-01.txt (Transparent
>> SDH/SONET over Packet). This is an individual draft submitted to the
>> PWE3 working group to propose a new structure-agnostic pseudowire
>> encapsulation for SONET/SDH client signals, as opposed to RFC 4842
>> (SONET/SDH Circuit Emulation over Packet), which is structure-aware.
>> Before the PWE3 WG decides whether to progress with this work, we
>> would very much appreciate SG15's opinion regarding the correctness of
>> the draft's technical approach, its suitability for standardization in
>> the IETF, and whether it unnecessarily duplicates the functionality of
>> RFC 4842.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Andrew G. Malis
>> Matthew Bocci
>> PWE3 Working Group Chairs
>> _______________________________________________
>> pwe3 mailing list
>> pwe3@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email