Re: [PWE3] TDM Channels and TDMPW Payload

Javi <javi@trajano.us.es> Mon, 14 December 2009 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <javi@trajano.us.es>
X-Original-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DE13A6887 for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:42:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.286, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RfVsrqFuNx-e for <pwe3@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:42:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.us.es (mail.us.es [193.147.175.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F123A6849 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:42:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 30469 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2009 22:42:17 +0100
Received: from unknown (HELO us.es) (192.168.2.11) by us.es with SMTP; 14 Dec 2009 22:42:17 +0100
Received: (qmail 9724 invoked by uid 507); 14 Dec 2009 21:42:18 -0000
Received: from 127.0.0.1 by antivirus1 (envelope-from <javi@trajano.us.es>, uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.06 (clamdscan: 0.95.3/10169. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.037904 secs); 14 Dec 2009 21:42:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO us.es) (127.0.0.1) by us.es with SMTP; 14 Dec 2009 21:42:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 9606 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2009 22:42:14 +0100
Received: from unknown (HELO trajano.us.es) (193.147.162.130) by us.es with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 14 Dec 2009 22:42:14 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.40] (trajano.us.es [193.147.162.130]) (authenticated bits=0) by trajano.us.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id nBELgHh7029192; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:42:18 +0100
Message-ID: <4B26B136.5000907@trajano.us.es>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:42:14 +0100
From: Javi <javi@trajano.us.es>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
References: <4763642.1259522511830.JavaMail.root@viefep14> <A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C76BFB8073CDF@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com> <4B12E258.5070708@trajano.us.es> <48E7911F78327A449A9FB956376672863360CD06@exrad4.ad.rad.co.il> <4B1582BA.8040803@trajano.us.es> <48E7911F78327A449A9FB956376672863413B9AA@exrad4.ad.rad.co.il> <4B1822D5.40904@trajano.us.es> <A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C76BFB81E7157@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com> <4B22E4E5.9080107@trajano.us.es> <48E7911F78327A449A9FB956376672863462A347@exrad4.ad.rad.co.il> <4B267EB2.8040301@trajano.us.es>
In-Reply-To: <4B267EB2.8040301@trajano.us.es>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030709040509000404040206"
Cc: Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@rad.com>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] TDM Channels and TDMPW Payload
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:42:36 -0000

Thanks. Any about this?

[YJS] Yes, trunk defects can be so indicated. If the AAL2 channels come 
from a single E1 or T1 you can use the L, R and M.

[Javi-New] ITU-T Recommendation Y.1452 (clause 8.3.1),  describing 
TDMoIP AAL.2, indicates bits R, M of the CW are reserved (value always 
0). The, if a TDMPW AAL.2 can emulate a full trunk, where does it carry 
circuit level defects?

Regards,

Javi