Re: Re: MPLS PWs over IP: Text for draft-ietf-pwe3-control-protocol-04.txt

"W. Mark Townsley" <townsley@cisco.com> Mon, 08 December 2003 13:27 UTC

From: "W. Mark Townsley" <townsley@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Re: MPLS PWs over IP: Text for draft-ietf-pwe3-control-protocol-04.txt
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 14:27:05 +0100
Lines: 20
Sender: pwe3-admin@ietf.org
References: <200312032009.hB3K9CX93427@merlot.juniper.net> <3FCE4DC4.9020101@cisco.com> <20031203154500.I70999@sapphire.juniper.net> <3FCF708D.4000209@cisco.com> <20031205103858.Y37331@sapphire.juniper.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>, Luca Martini <lmartini@cisco.com>, stbryant@cisco.com, Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>, "Eric Rosen (erosen)" <erosen@cisco.com>, pwe3@ietf.org
X-From: pwe3-admin@ietf.org Mon Dec 08 14:28:06 2003
Return-path: <pwe3-admin@ietf.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Rahul Aggarwal <rahul@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <20031205103858.Y37331@sapphire.juniper.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: pwe3-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Status: O
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20140418091723.2560.23560.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>

Rahul Aggarwal wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> 
> draft-townsley-l2tpv3-mpls-01.txt is not a MPLS WG document.
> MPLS-OVER-IP-GRE is.

There is no requirement that I know of for a non-normative reference to be on 
the IETF Standards Track.

>>we would need to reference your upcoming MPLS over IPsec
>>encapsulation draft as well.
> 
> As I meantioned above, it is not an existing IETF doucument.

I logically assumed that if you thought GRE and IP needed a reference in the 
document to be clear, IPsec would as well.

- Mark