Re: [PWE3] draft-medved-pwe3-of-config-00.txt posted, review please

Thanks Andrew. Working on the next rev and will incorporate your
suggestions/comments.

---dmm

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Andrew G. Malis <amalis@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dave, Jan, Andrew,
>
> An interesting draft. I have a few comments, with my WG chair hat off:
>
> 1. An editorial comment, there's no "-" or internal uppercase "W" in
> "Pseudowire", which is the proper spelling (I saw at least three
> different spellings in the draft).
>
> 2. Section 1.3 states: "PWs are
>    configured as bi-directional paths over the MPLS-TP network, usually
>    by an external management platform.  At present no open standards
>    exist to provision these PWs, and therefore there is a reliance on
>    vendor specific provisioning platforms."
>
> Certainly, there's nothing that prevents the use of T-LDP for PW use
> in MPLS-TP networks, this is already documented in section 5.2 of RFC
> 6373.
>
> Speaking of which, you should also have a table in your draft similar
> to the table in section 5.2 that shows how your draft meets the
> MPLS-TP control plane requirements listed in section 2 of RFC 6373.
>
> You may also wish to read draft-cao-pwe3-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp,
> which specifies useful functionality in this area.
>
> In any case, you should be clear that this is an alternative control
> plane to T-LDP.
>
> 3. Section 4: In addition to RFC 6423, you may wish to include a
> reference to draft-ietf-pwe3-vccv-for-gal, which defines the VCCV mode
> for use with MPLS-TP. You may also wish to reference RFC 5860.
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:11 PM, David Meyer <dmm@1-4-5.net> wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> "MPLS-TP PseudoWire Configuration using OpenFlow 1.3" has just been
>> posted. Looking forward to your review.
>>
>> --dmm (for Jan, dward, and Andrew)
>> _______________________________________________
>> pwe3 mailing list
>> pwe3@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3