Re: [PWE3] [mpls] Feedback request: draft on IP/MPLS transmission interruption

Correction: discussion should be on the OPSAWG list.

Thanks,
Andy

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Andrew G. Malis <amalis@gmail.com> wrote:
> pwe3 WG,
>
> This is a draft that is of interest to the pwe3 WG in addition to the
> mpls WG. On a first reading, the draft doesn't seem to be taking the
> requirements of PW applications into account. As Loa and Adrian say
> below, comments should be on the opsarea list.
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
> Date: Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [mpls] Feedback request: draft on IP/MPLS transmission interruption
> To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
> Cc: ietf@cdl.asgaard.org, mpls@ietf.org, lilianyuan@chinamobile.com,
> Fan Peng <fanpeng@chinamobile.com>
>
>
> Working Group,
>
> Adrian was quicker than I was on this, just want echo his sentiment.
> I think that by default the comments should go to the opsawg mailing
> list - but if you for some reason is not subscribed to that list, send
> them to the mpls wg list or directly to me and I will forward.
>
> /Loa
>
>
> On 2012-07-10 14:20, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>>
>> I think the MPLS WG should look at this I-D as well.
>>
>> Feedback to the authors or on the OPSAWG list, please.
>>
>> Adrian
>>
>> *From:*opsawg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] *On
>> Behalf Of *Fan Peng
>> *Sent:* 10 July 2012 05:52
>> *To:* opsawg@ietf.org
>> *Cc:* ietf@cdl.asgaard.org; lilianyuan@chinamobile.com
>> *Subject:* [OPSAWG] Feedback request: draft on IP/MPLS transmission
>>
>> interruption
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> We have just updated the draft on IP/MPLS transmission interruption to
>> 01 version, and we would like to hear comments from you.
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fan-opsawg-transmission-interruption-01
>>
>> We presented the last version in Paris hoping the industry could discuss
>> the problem of whether the sub-50ms outage time requirement is suitable
>> for IP/MPLS. We proposed at the meeting two principles for network and
>> service design, configuration and operation: the IP/MPLS bearer should
>> satisfy quality requirements of upper level services and applications,
>> while services and applications should also take into account the
>> intrinsic IP capabilities. We did analysis on softswitch and reached the
>> IP interruption requirement of 3 sec.
>>
>> In this 01 version we added case of parameter configuration in SS7
>> network to illustrate principle 2 (adaptation to IP). We gave examples
>> on SCTP and M2PA and delivered the concept that upper levels should be
>> more tolerable to IP best effort to avoid frequent disconnection.
>> Parameter configuration needs to consider both requirement of
>> application and nature of IP. Influence on service like SMS is also
>> involved.
>>
>> Any feedback would be highly appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>>
>> Fan, Peng
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>
> --
>
>
> Loa Andersson                         email: loa.andersson@ericsson.com
> Sr Strategy and Standards Manager            loa@pi.nu
> Ericsson Inc                          phone: +46 10 717 52 13
>                                              +46 767 72 92 13
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls