IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Editorial rework (#2080)

janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Tue, 04 December 2018 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10179130DCE for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 18:43:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eHQtA3ATwmAE for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 18:43:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62E75130DDF for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2018 18:43:22 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 18:43:21 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1543891401; bh=6Wfv2OZIqJbsTeBv7sa2wA715YIibHtC908ZAY/fOOc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=E3CBAIhOOShe428wc1rd0Mff8O4kcLaZP4OK0yGosveOPPr4xJCEf3zB/lEAnhtuc nghsDSlFe9NbKW+f4Iz5p+jiXHO0Xci+GgH9PcrD9Seb1SuqVHRVD1ipTCpCEjxI2N LhC4fTlHSj6i+u5Cg/99H2kuAfvp0TCoQga4LEfY=
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab8d07d7c8255c7fd6ddb1384827d5f77cfdf6510392cf00000001181dabc992a169ce17080d94@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2080/review/181071843@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2080@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2080@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Editorial rework (#2080)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c05e9c9a315a_127e3fd069ad45c0817f8"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/0RlAj1Wgp3S34vu7yHdewYBnS9s>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 02:43:24 -0000

janaiyengar commented on this pull request.



> +upon detecting loss.  Implementations that detect spurious retransmissions and
+increase the reordering threshold in packets or time MAY choose to start with
+smaller initial reordering thresholds to minimize recovery latency.
+
+### Packet Threshold
+
+The RECOMMENDED initial value for the packet reordering threshold
+(kPacketThreshold) is 3, based on TCP loss detection {{?RFC5681}} {{?RFC6675}}.
+
+Some networks may exhibit higher degrees of reordering, causing a sender to
+detect spurious losses.  Implementers MAY use algorithms developed for TCP, such
+as TCP-NCR {{?RFC4653}}, to improve QUIC's reordering resilience.
+
+### Time Threshold {#time-threshold}
+
+Ack-based loss detection uses a time threshold to determine how much reordering

Done, and moved this para below. The ordering is better now I think.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2080#discussion_r238513431

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email