Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add the TLS bits, refine some of the transport bits (a132666)

Nicolas Kuhn <notifications@github.com> Mon, 19 November 2018 13:58 UTC

Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:58:47 -0800
From: Nicolas Kuhn <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abedd34a807fdd39130751e57cf6b8ab9f73baafbb92cf00000001180a839792a163ce01de5e70@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/a13266667d30e1fd872375675aab96bf76038f06/31350384@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/a13266667d30e1fd872375675aab96bf76038f06@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/commit/a13266667d30e1fd872375675aab96bf76038f06@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add the TLS bits, refine some of the transport bits (a132666)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bf2c1972055d_650a3f9f61ed45b4228350"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/0ZlCrp3gde4T_ZS6WDl1SBrKrRg>

Having only one spin bit for in-network measurements make it very hard to identify issues in the network. To do so, you may need loss and latency measurements that can hardly be achieved with a single bit. What is the rationale behind including these bits under the the header protection ?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/commit/a13266667d30e1fd872375675aab96bf76038f06#commitcomment-31350384

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add the TLS bits, refine… Alexandre Ferrieux
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add the TLS bits, refine… Nicolas Kuhn
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add the TLS bits, refine… Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Add the TLS bits, refine… MikkelFJ