Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Build a version negotiation mechanism that mostly doesn't add round trips (#1773)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Wed, 30 January 2019 03:06 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB3413111E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:06:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XCb1lKEhL3ds for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:06:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 198D813111A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:06:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 19:06:23 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1548817583; bh=OuFbXJa62pLpSTUt1C1Ujnbv/73fTe/6qEW7ZzJSqek=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ifhRNvo7e5477UOR3Jy5HLH5BIpVYlpM/gUg7CQDrnQAgYKb5CP7+QbRf7PQWScK7 R6NxWvYRxwQqowN3u0AjwHrsZ7IF5X8oFY0hsC8eqtogXC5cKzt54B+6lIhe34mK61 poxVfTWrFvIGrFZ68RLCsEdhBJDVWZgjYEKnO05k=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abd7f5581f62e5a9b86089bcb4a9b0740473c485e692cf000000011868d6af92a169ce159141e8@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1773/458794562@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1773@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1773@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Build a version negotiation mechanism that mostly doesn't add round trips (#1773)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c5114afd1639_bbf3f9e9bad45c0875fb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/13__o1xoJTtLhqhZ-P2RP-A_vpk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 03:06:27 -0000

Tokyo proposal: take version downgrade protections out of the draft, make a new draft with an extension that provides that.  This would entail merging a fixed-up version of #2313 into the docs.  Disabling downgrade protection would fix #1810.

If that extension makes traction before we complete v1, then we can merge it back in.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1773#issuecomment-458794562