Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove mention of round-trip time in HTTP/3 (#3346)

Kazuho Oku <> Wed, 15 January 2020 00:38 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A551E120046 for <>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:38:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4qyU7ibWZ6Ea for <>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:38:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A42112002F for <>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:38:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:38:48 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1579048728; bh=/xQPNvwTHQpmGYf7mpuP53XtoXc4AimYzWcKTH/HrKQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=0NSXDwqbMyYid6T4f9bpHm+ClLaDq/IbeufvsJh+thLQvRNRNF7jf0kNXNOliV95K sFaivycV3ZXepulz7sJBSGwx396wQzc34BH4z433kkvIEByywBtlGGCHDgNQKqUI8c nQ+T1KNTmdgC2ansZKliCWTxZiLT5d8vkT/W5jZU=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3346/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove mention of round-trip time in HTTP/3 (#3346)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e1e5f1879485_617d3ffcc36cd96414238b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:38:51 -0000

The other issue of the last two sentences (quoted below) is that they do not suggest how an endpoint should choose last Stream ID of the second GOAWAY frame.
> After allowing time for any in-flight requests (at least one round-trip time), the server MAY send another GOAWAY frame with an updated last Stream ID. This ensures that a connection can be cleanly shut down without losing requests.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: