Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ben Kaduk's HTTP/3 Comment 4 (#4779)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Fri, 22 January 2021 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1893A1518 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:31:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.258
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.258 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nGOqapFDLxsn for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:31:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-25.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60F063A0C9E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:31:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-2e33223.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.115.47]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9EA8D8407EE for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:31:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1611351067; bh=XO4RhfkFVGsscqS+iBFrutWTsJe7gCtgFxcMwb7EHfA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=A/KYRHt1cQ3rieDp36uYhQ/vEXX7w6CuoQiNB5OTGjxxr7L47eOnYCbJSZbPOUUuu 1jmh44CCFyDvCSPVIe25CyJx85/gB0/kbGUcZ0GySKOm+qwyeLlSHTfUVoALrkuSa8 MF3M2ENWqoBt9PgioOi41hjBIXKlhESslNX7qBUY=
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:31:07 -0800
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYWDBAU4SEVAY7S6456C4SRXEVBNHHC6GTPEA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4779/765696454@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4779@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4779@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ben Kaduk's HTTP/3 Comment 4 (#4779)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_600b441b9bd4f_ee21a0495634"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/26SSh9QYv52uB5ncmPTk1OeATGY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 21:31:10 -0000

It's also worth noting that HTTP/3 as currently defined requires exactly QUIC version 1.  Permitting additional QUIC versions will require an update or a follow-on spec which can adapt to any changed abstractions at the same time.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4779#issuecomment-765696454