Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Enable/disable/coordinate spin per path (#2751)

MikkelFJ <> Wed, 29 May 2019 05:04 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD081200F7 for <>; Tue, 28 May 2019 22:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.008
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uR_c7dZBqV71 for <>; Tue, 28 May 2019 22:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD17B120047 for <>; Tue, 28 May 2019 22:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 22:04:49 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1559106289; bh=5J4bn67mk2qrh44VHpZfRf8fbHKPSSTc42HqMU1xXsY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=zUcxffVIxbQeDfuNhlnyWQfDnINwfptxQfbq2r0k5LQuR+KYnvkMoEJzmdsTTZtVW /YRe+/IqU3zPdWak17we7ciN0jPHiNXNp7MrKlbp8FwZewaRObtC3Tse/jjlrPHRDW NYGKqhhvM2Og8Qs+b7BuuA9VNO9zoFY8Qr6EwHPs=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2751/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Enable/disable/coordinate spin per path (#2751)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cee12f1dc458_35ca3f8f94acd95c30563f"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 05:04:54 -0000

mikkelfj commented on this pull request.

> @@ -4019,14 +4019,14 @@ to disable the spin bit either globally or on a per-connection basis. Even when
 the spin bit is not disabled by the administrator, implementations MUST disable
 the spin bit for a given connection with a certain likelihood. The random
 selection process SHOULD be designed such that on average the spin bit is
-disabled for at least one eighth of connections. The selection process performed
-at the beginning of the connection SHOULD be applied for all paths used by the
-In case multiple connections share the same five-tuple, that is, have the same
-source and destination IP address and UDP ports, endpoints should try to
-co-ordinate across all connections to ensure a clear signal to any on-path
-measurement points.
+disabled for at least one eighth of network paths. The selection process

It doesn't really matter if the client and server disagrees in general as long as enough connections agree on enabling spin. As to privacy that is for justifying being silent so if one endpoint decides not to be, that shouldn't really matter either.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: