Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how many connection IDs the peer is willing to store (#1994)

ianswett <> Sat, 24 November 2018 01:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC9F128CF3 for <>; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 17:43:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q6hZnsmKUSB2 for <>; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 17:43:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CC6A130E89 for <>; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 17:43:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 17:43:25 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1543023805; bh=Vikzm1Kd4aaFZjVBA1Uuqmf5cCB7EYkUI9aPWVyEW3s=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=ImLPCZx3F7Ktg1Hx9XNzouF0HwfONQqwzpcIpy3gFLbBCK4HaZ1okigDLzrF8pHm1 FT1sVlS6YbEdpJoinBaoy3lFOh+1nfvYCk3YG0RafwLZ0tz5e5Fkm1233LJd5ciMgG DvCZ+fSd/k+Yd8m30rJhoFugOI2H4+Chaz3acpho=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1994/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] endpoints don't know how many connection IDs the peer is willing to store (#1994)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bf8acbddf95_218e3fb1eaad45b8169186"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 01:43:28 -0000

One idea: In an effort to enforce the principles, but not be overly strict or complex, maybe allow the connection to be closed with an error if a NEW_CONNECTION_ID frame is received with an ID that's more than the max_connection_ids from the largest retired connection id(or 0 if no ids have been retired)?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: