Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommendation not sensitive to paths with high RTT variability (#2207)
MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Wed, 19 December 2018 09:59 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B3712F1A5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 01:59:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OCcdlVajWo_B for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 01:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-16.smtp.github.com (out-16.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C50B130DEF for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 01:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 01:59:46 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1545213586; bh=nNuhyhNAqpCWQXhOdOGC0CTIirwRE9h6YkYskW423jw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=NaO0HMWnc8HJzvKD8DnXyDxZJQPN8JfASKDJjLxeNbVmqtTvajLZew/1a+Iw2k9KV mm0JIL0MsBNupR8MQk2DCT6YBVXiP9dTwqINiu+4lD3LxcP9/MpU4I3kT4ea/d80sV tIPWkrqTasT4DQrUHuz/KgQoROczRMkn1mgfyt2Q=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abea7f956e826a29bee88cbe649c28e3633b48b69992cf000000011831d89292a169ce17635f26@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2207/448537453@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2207@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2207@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommendation not sensitive to paths with high RTT variability (#2207)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c1a16922a963_fb73f96038d45b82129c7"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/4IPLwHWswR3I1E6WWoCGGygkQBQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 09:59:51 -0000
@ianswett's point is that even if there is variation it probably will not change fast between two packets, rather it changes over longer time frames such is the interval between PING packets. I'm not sure this is always true since a 250ms buffering is unlikely. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2207#issuecomment-448537453
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommendati… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… Loganaden Velvindron
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… Loganaden Velvindron
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… Dave Täht
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… Martin Thomson