Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommendation not sensitive to paths with high RTT variability (#2207)
janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Thu, 20 December 2018 03:47 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A448130F1A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 19:47:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.064
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.064 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQR7pWUlxxMT for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 19:47:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 899A1130EE0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 19:47:41 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 19:47:40 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1545277660; bh=RaRLmXKVBsluhpqEVl4J1xqrCNU8Q5laQxLLMTmIETg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=EmD2rX6iUoE+bMxUaT8Tfe1GXvM8nxP3UAEauwLmOnEA3poO9PAmUWqErb6kKO70K v0Zi5V8cZx270wgUXf1E1EhDIWZIhjc/Q87LUVzV0E3wEfznt16Bqkmk3eb4m/Otj1 77Rz3M/WVEQtOyXwVis2VLP6GAl392LWNSBvLvUY=
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab23c917c842de29d79405971fb60c8d2918e0c89992cf000000011832d2dc92a169ce17635f26@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2207/448853795@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2207@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2207@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommendation not sensitive to paths with high RTT variability (#2207)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c1b10dc63f80_776f3fe7804d45c0234098"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/jfLbjHl_WCcHkhcDQonecrjpriY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 03:47:43 -0000
@ianswett : My suggestion is to note that variance is not included in the time-threshold measurement, and that implementers MAY experiment with it as well (in addition to the others). I don't think the long list of RTT measurements on this issue are making the necessary point -- high RTT variability has nothing to do with reordering. That said, it's definitely possible for a network to have high variability _and_ reordering. They don't need to be correlated, they just need to happen together. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2207#issuecomment-448853795
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommendati… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… Loganaden Velvindron
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… Loganaden Velvindron
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… Dave Täht
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Time based loss recommen… Martin Thomson