IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss considerations for max_ack_delay (#2186)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Mon, 17 December 2018 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37D6127333 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 08:57:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.056
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id naUscgxR4GkX for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 08:57:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A106127332 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 08:57:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 08:57:05 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1545065825; bh=kiKE0O8NeHe9GTD3damvbxKaf4OxVA4fcs4MT/m4YJY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=rvyg3Bv/k+OXerOi+uenQB5it2XMvl+zKk8yCohtX+KMjwGMtYXCPAWzTlWb1D558 XzpGfwEp1mWzLwhIp0okfgh3MSWldPvLMH8yFNPOnnWKYLEFwk+B2jYMsQohjWXn43 vSUzlB2Ld6G4N9deqI7DuDDI+H+LLpQ8pww4oAWw=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab879dbab69dbe3bbeb2b8015b28d6d2e5f07f397d92cf00000001182f976192a169ce175240ec@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2186/447917740@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2186@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2186@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Discuss considerations for max_ack_delay (#2186)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c17d5611063e_2f793fa829ad45c44220d1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/4gCl2NmkLuoywQn5S6fOUR2axgg>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 16:57:10 -0000

Somewhat related, editorially.  Jana was going to move the ack sending text from recovery into transport, because now it's split between two spots and there's already at least one inconsistency.

The text about max_ack_delay is currently in 3 spots from what I can tell, so maybe it'd be nice to unify that as well?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2186#issuecomment-447917740

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email