Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 5-tuple routing and SPA (#3608)

ianswett <> Tue, 19 May 2020 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1988F3A10EC for <>; Tue, 19 May 2020 13:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r8JSmYVhCOss for <>; Tue, 19 May 2020 13:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 683543A0062 for <>; Tue, 19 May 2020 13:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D929660922 for <>; Tue, 19 May 2020 13:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1589920494; bh=ryU9YvXdMtKmkHg9bAh1IVk21AQ4uwxDV0By2lwebAw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=pL+qoAbFpJR6bvTdPePxPyWbX68/tpPhO7RrYdairBFQ+nflaiC0lWxmef9uRttE7 mF239DO6xBdX23ovu6VFBvMLfGXAQ77OKW7bwjcICkLFW4gXHHtfUrMmu9+r50CrW3 zuGBjH2TlExV4uwHvzHjzOuD5dGU91lida8sYNTU=
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 13:34:54 -0700
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3608/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 5-tuple routing and SPA (#3608)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ec442ee4d74d_42743f94330cd968209381"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 20:34:57 -0000

I've thought about this, and I don't believe we need this change, but I also think the change @kazuho suggested makes the current behavior better overall.

A server that supports migration on the SPA(ie: unicast) and not on the handshake address(ie: anycast) will end up not disabling migration and hoping that most clients migrate to the SPA or don't support migration of any sort.  That seems like a plausible hope, though I'm a bit leery of hope based protocol design.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: