Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Most the Retry-related fixes (#1788)

MikkelFJ <> Sun, 23 September 2018 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2601130DCC for <>; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 07:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.008
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.008 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HU0nJijtwu00 for <>; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 07:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D0D3127133 for <>; Sun, 23 Sep 2018 07:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 07:23:05 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1537712586; bh=k7j7Md6vQVUdgfadCP3ds+Vj2tsRqU4M2l76Z9O8syA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=iS/dRkoVer/Km0KtaF4l/cblmd6AXEBh1TctZsizFW0f3MDLugIfnc5tS8IXsngik hzi/CTwOj1NmC5utvhz4VNLPc7AxtwcEFbbWD6wNxZ5ytpUj7JuwDIAOicPpKTJQH7 XBc8mOCLyMuO6DO+5i3MfyEvakoj1ZDHBcgWnp0Q=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1788/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Most the Retry-related fixes (#1788)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ba7a1c978375_52553fdb71cd45c411819e5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2018 14:23:10 -0000

mikkelfj commented on this pull request.

-A Retry packet does not include a packet number and cannot be explicitly
-acknowledged by a client.
+A server MAY send Retry packets in response to Initial and 0-RTT packets.  A
+server can either discard or buffer 0-RTT packets that it receives.  A server

What about perferect forward secrecy - could there be an issue with crypto reuse here?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: