Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Point out that the payload size could decrease (#3424)

Martin Thomson <> Mon, 10 February 2020 08:18 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD6A12009C for <>; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:18:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5LOfUdUJloTv for <>; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:18:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00107120098 for <>; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C15280FE9 for <>; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:18:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1581322686; bh=wW+rWOgCfoSgKafGyaoTlDCfLRuzA4RtrUJfB1ChXEk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Udr8oJPwTuL93WG8hNhqCCbdchND9ntVRHtN+OLX/x48VBRD6STvPxMoK6owZqc1p IpzXufnYg9HkIoNQ0SIBmEmSPgp92gg8GJ3qo3jpUy6LnLKxH9og+l96TNPl+4JtSh begxE9+P6+atnufPeqX/2GCqWR43347lT7z6yT48=
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:18:06 -0800
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3424/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Point out that the payload size could decrease (#3424)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e4111be10d4a_77753fdf56ccd95c240445"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:18:09 -0000

martinthomson approved this pull request.

Wôt Eric sèd tü.

> @@ -3374,9 +3374,11 @@ priorities specified by the application indicate otherwise (see
 Even though a sender is encouraged to assemble frames containing up-to-date
 information every time it sends a packet, it is not forbidden to retransmit
-copies of frames from lost packets.  A receiver MUST accept packets containing
-an outdated frame, such as a MAX_DATA frame carrying a smaller maximum data than
-one found in an older packet.
+copies of frames from lost packets.  A sender which retransmits copies of frames

copies of frames from lost packets.  A sender that retransmits copies of frames


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: