IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)

Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com> Thu, 18 April 2019 07:04 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40ED61202FD for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ffqPr_JBP-aL for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F53312006B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 00:03:56 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1555571036; bh=veHf0IQUvTa1fLClixlNXpxT3CFupSB+1naN+X23bcg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Aq+hXZUHAUgigJ1dxpYVCHmCrSmiwZUqoIpK8VnjupR0zOsoR6GwEBvmUjgQV77Xw P1arb2l7x8IUFd0ZNYEXzz56Pa4lfVeLm4ZN8HaOW5d1sLaGyh3Xlz59lCL4BVcHjA jURSoDToN9HYIcfEy5eDuYc6wSKjvsdf8PiuOQwg=
From: Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5EQHJERT5JAYHFQBV2YVJ5ZEVBNHHBS7N6SA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2580/484381663@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2580@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2580@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Is path validation a SHOULD or a MUST -- pick one! (#2580)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cb8215cc73cd_76763fe840acd95c318985"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: igorlord
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/9e9wCgKYxgwV9UEGbNU-7htkGt4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 07:04:05 -0000

@larseggert, SHOULD is a lot weaker than "MUST, unless" because SHOULD allows skipping the behavior even if the "unless" part is not performed.

"MUST A, unless B" is a syntactic sugar for "MUST A or B".

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2580#issuecomment-484381663

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email