Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 3+ and 4+ in the QPACK wire format are complex and inefficient (#3561)
afrind <notifications@github.com> Tue, 31 March 2020 18:23 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1AF3A2668 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.048, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2sr5dE_PjDEl for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D62743A0929 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-fb56993.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-fb56993.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.19.31]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E6B6A1205 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1585679008; bh=/FwhRzbOuqgwRSoe4YHJ4O4MIFwXz9IRStwYFW6RYKw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=cknM4MkoZh95g+XQPgin6vRVjXMzedZ5lzzuvuA8D/gyI9t2CoxsTYg7nONV+wA3x uaWuWdWOJ5sZUyd97I9H6jMcXZoM+XlJd6Ue8kKn4zDXkQ96zDVk58bvDWTi6Js35l D2kvPRs25jP2DjY4XnPqYEtglzpKQL9WuBBer/w8=
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:23:28 -0700
From: afrind <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZAMVBEQ7E75ISMALF4R5V2BEVBNHHCGNMNEI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3561/606793719@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3561@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3561@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 3+ and 4+ in the QPACK wire format are complex and inefficient (#3561)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e838aa039427_77a93fd5c8ecd960127794"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: afrind
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/B3-n9yS0HuSKGQa8j66m-myFXdQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 18:23:33 -0000
I concur with the other responders here. 1. Sharing code with HPACK is a non-goal 2. The instructions as specified do save some bytes 3. It's not that complex to add a string encoding function that takes a prefix for the length 4. Most of all, we shouldn't be making design changes this late -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3561#issuecomment-606793719
- [quicwg/base-drafts] 3+ and 4+ in the QPACK wire … Kazu Yamamoto
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 3+ and 4+ in the QPACK w… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 3+ and 4+ in the QPACK w… Kazu Yamamoto
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 3+ and 4+ in the QPACK w… Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 3+ and 4+ in the QPACK w… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 3+ and 4+ in the QPACK w… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 3+ and 4+ in the QPACK w… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 3+ and 4+ in the QPACK w… Kazu Yamamoto
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] 3+ and 4+ in the QPACK w… Kazu Yamamoto