Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Guidance wrt ACK frames that don't fit in a packet (#3311)

ianswett <> Sun, 29 December 2019 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDFA120045 for <>; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 06:41:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o_DlL8-6ITxM for <>; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 06:41:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB1BF12000F for <>; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 06:41:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 06:41:49 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1577630509; bh=le5PuaEUsC57SR9FIZKtMeA+LvAAt0aFoe+sSW2zRI4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=kIwkKx3tQL3RVxcCWYtEnZlLQKdKGEWhW7xVKEO2nKjCjfXhd6BaT/70WP8gEzFJ0 RFlhVbUeQhYthGqES3VVSS7mwj6eEJe4Yr4ZZUJvqamzLRwyFOOTOQGFm9saEyVX6t mkdYqEuUavPXovUtgyuZTj/r35goSZiwNCa/I5vs=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3311/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Guidance wrt ACK frames that don't fit in a packet (#3311)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e08bb2d2a9e1_5d03f98990cd96c57689b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 14:41:51 -0000

There is a good amount of existing text about what ranges to send, ie "ACK frames SHOULD always acknowledge the most recently received packets,"

I think this can be solved with some editorial additions to 13.2.2.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: