Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Endpoint MAY discard CIDs (#1992)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Tue, 13 November 2018 19:12 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D555130DE0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:12:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9JNC_9mm4DNS for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:12:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C05B31277C8 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:12:19 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:12:18 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1542136338; bh=ZtGMc8n4rfHF4KNgtI2ybKNQzfg+WONvPvYcgu8yuPo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=J9iXkqdiKVlUiRR+PBLMQyW0OfQwghLrCCzZKR8JAEG0AWG98QCMPEo7r6NX9tC1f HLw8IlJ7Ic7TGiuTG63CsxIKyiqckP/Fj3QUR+gAJwcZpnf7A5sio3PqLDnbikRwH+ xifoOD/+1rkVSO+7Jbn9aeaRLWJQhDtmQ5AZQ9k4=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab9ea929f70e2a13a71644cabb2259d3d406a16a1192cf000000011802e41292a169ce16a1bb2f@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1992/review/174538949@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1992@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1992@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Endpoint MAY discard CIDs (#1992)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5beb2212dfa30_16e83fa1ad8d45bc66462"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/FlgkTLxo6VaZ3W0st91EZO72_bs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 19:12:21 -0000

ianswett commented on this pull request.



>  
 When an endpoint issues a connection ID, it MUST accept packets that carry this
 connection ID for the duration of the connection or until its peer invalidates
 the connection ID via a RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frame
 ({{frame-retire-connection-id}}).
 
+Endpoints store received connection IDs for future use.  An endpoint that
+receives excessive connection IDs MAY discard those it cannot store.  An
+endpoint that issues connection IDs cannot expect its peer to store and use all
+issued connection IDs.

Belated question: when you discard them, it seems you should not send a RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frame, otherwise you may just get more?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1992#pullrequestreview-174538949