Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path Challenge Padding and Amplification Protection (#4257)

Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Mon, 26 October 2020 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C9C3A0C88 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7qTUptM7XQSB for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-17.smtp.github.com (out-17.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1A3E3A0A4E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-c191835.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.103.46]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 233CB5C05FE for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1603726941; bh=cBzkDHKNLxK83O+dCt3Go6JGslIfBz+sWqZVuZFr6cw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=g36IAQmDwaJc+Mvs5s/yDZRbxPo4WPV0rzwNcde0w+WgnSCFUqdJZW2p5UqKg6OS7 Fgc/YSQA+CH+eIKgKqcpTuBFbQrzKmUBSJ4CXFkCIJysjko91DBCKV8Ij/rjtFf2nn ODxGnUbc7vxmehFELFdbhyjwv/3s0d/t136J1tS4=
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 08:42:21 -0700
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZPVNZ7RVUEGIRLWSN5ULHV3EVBNHHCWUAGFQ@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4257/716633217@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4257@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4257@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Path Challenge Padding and Amplification Protection (#4257)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f96ee5d1fbd1_4319b41905e9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/N1QqFN5SOsYfaBtsLLSioFmuWe4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 15:42:24 -0000

My math:

- Assuming outgoing packets are 1 to 1 with incoming, that gives us a limit of 6 packets per second, per path
- Estimated the incoming UDP payload size to be 20 bytes
- The outgoing UDP payload size will be 1200 bytes

`Incoming Rate = (IPv4_Header_Size + UDP_Header_Size + 20) * 6 PKTS/SEC * PATHS_PER_CONN * CONNS`
`Outgoing Rate = (IPv4_Header_Size + UDP_Header_Size + 1200) * 6 PKTS/SEC * PATHS_PER_CONN * CONNS`

The amplification ratio is `(IPv4_Header_Size + UDP_Header_Size + 1200) /  (IPv4_Header_Size + UDP_Header_Size + 20)`, which is `1228 / 48 = 25.58333`. For incoming size of 28 bytes (8 byte CID) the number comes down to `21.93`.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4257#issuecomment-716633217