Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field in SPA (#3898)
Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com> Tue, 14 July 2020 00:22 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8283A0BE6 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 17:22:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z5ISFyin_skp for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 17:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-24.smtp.github.com (out-24.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BF9B3A0BDB for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 17:22:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-b2150d3.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-b2150d3.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.113.12]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E2C6A0D07 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 17:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1594686143; bh=+DVK8fi9LiA1rz6qgrwXJLC/H1SLvx5GRsx5teAYLkU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=NxkOGpceFpCNra4VdZYP5dpGptBTwhR9hY6XjJyyFcaDTi4kW/dY5xAr5yBjYowNV /5y2Z3aaEIGzBXYcAT3Ym5F0qQ6A/UIN9jrR0QTZrbTNJQqDXmBfTZwJNvmKhfck3W JqioSd6ulv/o2Yrrs4qoItOPTWBD5WkbPbI5At9E=
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 17:22:23 -0700
From: Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6N26N7JNAI5GMOIYF5DDN37EVBNHHCOG62GU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3898/review/447699048@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3898@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3898@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field in SPA (#3898)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f0cfabf658c8_7dd23ff321ecd96c139945d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: igorlord
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/OjHRhDhk3VffYBbOEfSs4xsgjUE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 00:22:26 -0000
@igorlord requested changes on this pull request. We need to clarify what to do about source addresses when changing protocol families. > @@ -2178,12 +2180,16 @@ before the handshake is confirmed, as defined in section 4.1.2 of {{QUIC-TLS}}. If the peer sent the disable_active_migration transport parameter, an endpoint also MUST NOT send packets (including probing packets; see {{probing}}) from a -different local address to the address the peer used during the handshake. An -endpoint that has sent this transport parameter, but detects that a peer has -nonetheless migrated to a different remote address MUST either drop the incoming -packets on that path without generating a stateless reset or proceed with path -validation and allow the peer to migrate. Generating a stateless reset or -closing the connection would allow third parties in the network to cause +different local address to the address the peer used during the handshake. If +the server sets the Disable Migration field in the preferred_address transport +parameter, the client MUST NOT send packets from a different local address to +the server's preferred address. You may want to specify that when Disable Migration is set, to migrate to an SPA of a different address family, the client MUST (SHOULD?) use a source address belonging to the same network attachment interface as the handshake address. > @@ -2178,12 +2180,16 @@ before the handshake is confirmed, as defined in section 4.1.2 of {{QUIC-TLS}}. If the peer sent the disable_active_migration transport parameter, an endpoint also MUST NOT send packets (including probing packets; see {{probing}}) from a -different local address to the address the peer used during the handshake. An -endpoint that has sent this transport parameter, but detects that a peer has -nonetheless migrated to a different remote address MUST either drop the incoming -packets on that path without generating a stateless reset or proceed with path -validation and allow the peer to migrate. Generating a stateless reset or -closing the connection would allow third parties in the network to cause +different local address to the address the peer used during the handshake. If +the server sets the Disable Migration field in the preferred_address transport +parameter, the client MUST NOT send packets from a different local address to I think we could replace MUST with SHOULD in regard to `disable_active_migration` and `Disable Migration`. Nothing here is enforceable, since unintended migrations can always happen. The effect is likely similar. > @@ -5078,6 +5086,7 @@ Preferred Address { IPv4 Port (16), IPv6 Address (128), IPv6 Port (16), + Disable Migration (8), We've had a proposal to make this flag per-address. Need to land this discussion. If we adopt the suggestion above about Disable Migration means for switching to a different protocol family, this becomes easier to reason about a per-family flag. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3898#pullrequestreview-447699048
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field in S… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field … Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field … Igor Lubashev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field … Igor Lubashev
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field … Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field … Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field … Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field … Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field … Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field … Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field … Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Disable Migration field … Martin Thomson