Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using standard Reno congestion control, ack every ~2 packets (#1428)
Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Wed, 18 July 2018 16:04 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A2A13120F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lviow5BfyuRM for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E89881311F8 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:04:03 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1531929843; bh=LTrT90zCaqYz1NcNNQtWSywaD7aLcu8qAIE5wvu0jY4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Y3BCy9pVPmrg8r79oJmyb08RRC8prFe5DXwwuxt0CSWJaWJnT0C5wB6lgQW1GqR9/ KekGtSi7pX7wFu3bMtbjhox46r3LyoQs+ufXco/M+U3E5XbBiTAcs3jOvuCjQrXPID ydRc19UNvCFnIWKq7oykEpB8Z3LxMcOLk5yai/dw=
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab7e6d9f27cdd35d13eb818269cfdfa8ff9d19750592cf00000001176726f392a169ce13ae108c@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1428/405985137@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1428@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1428@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using standard Reno congestion control, ack every ~2 packets (#1428)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b4f64f345e86_1901f3f867ecbef78151063"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/RwDp5PlpWt_JbS1W0m52wyGoxAs>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 16:04:20 -0000
@gloinul assuming the value can be updated dynamically, and isn't just a transport parameter, couldn't you send the update **in** your PMTUD probe packet? If the packet makes it and gets acknowledged, then everything is good. If the packet was too big, the packet doesn't make it, doesn't get acknowledged and then the peer doesn't even know you tried to increase it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1428#issuecomment-405985137
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… MikkelFJ
- [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using sta… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… janaiyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When the sender is using… Martin Thomson