[quicwg/base-drafts] What was intended by “control violations” (#4019)

Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com> Wed, 19 August 2020 14:30 UTC

Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 07:30:01 -0700
From: Lars Eggert <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKY362VS53TLTZZWJVV5JEMGTEVBNHHCRJGG5A@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4019@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] What was intended by “control violations” (#4019)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f3d3769a68c4_4f8a19641194b6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Tv20euKdTkKguCnDdi1PFBQENA8>

(Broken out of #3241.)

>A receiver maintains a cumulative sum of
>   bytes received on all streams, which is used to check for flow
>   control violations./
- It would have helped me, had this explained what was intended by “control violations” - I think it means to detect when the sender sends more than permitted by the flow control limit. I think the control part comes in a later sentence? (Is this measured against the largest advertised offset, or the current offset? … given what is written about reducing the advertised value?)



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4019

[quicwg/base-drafts] What was intended by “contro… Lars Eggert
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] What was intended by “co… Martin Thomson