Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define how an "out of order" packet is detected (#3347)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Mon, 20 January 2020 19:48 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9092E1207FE
for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:48:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id DTglUbgB3_OY for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:48:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-9.smtp.github.com (out-9.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.192])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D734B12080A
for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:48:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-d93c4b6.va3-iad.github.net
(github-lowworker-d93c4b6.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.47])
by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5253926163D
for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:48:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com;
s=pf2014; t=1579549699;
bh=DJt6V0WKNYgnI8wbRxGWOqOUxouq2DBt12gQFXFJFOk=;
h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID:
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From;
b=BR+qifFrXgvB1DAoew4oHyYuP1eyHTSMg9PW2UgpioLhxvW5LpmLYeQiHOB/p7fxI
Y/Q8z69jI+GGtN1In2gUDgHPF5gn8XxSrVOwldzqmJdQ7yK/2YPop1E3GK5dtDhpeY
R+yughXhYnXQkCugWoVgDub+B5IGQJagwmYsxWRg=
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:48:19 -0800
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts
<reply+AFTOJKZBOBL5BMT57RAQDPV4GM3IHEVBNHHCBRY4PA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3347/576409427@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3347@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3347@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define how an "out of order" packet is
detected (#3347)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--==_mimepart_5e2604038b55_71d53f8eebecd95c17615d";
charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/XSmVo2f7dirhE6NFP2tBmk3bUAc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG
<quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>,
<mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 19:48:27 -0000
That section used to be in recovery, where we have a definition already(which is now unused), so I'd suggest we move it over. "Out-of-order Packets: : Packets that do not increase the largest received packet number for its packet number space by exactly one. Packets arrive out of order when earlier packets are lost or delayed." -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3347#issuecomment-576409427
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Define how an "out of order"… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define how an "out of or… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define how an "out of or… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define how an "out of or… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define how an "out of or… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Define how an "out of or… Jana Iyengar