Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend algorithm for packet scheduler, rather than implementation (#3122)

ianswett <> Fri, 18 October 2019 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641C212085C for <>; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.453
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.453 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gwYuC1GHocuE for <>; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38C18120956 for <>; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:01:01 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1571436061; bh=62RWRTnlBnDLdTm0bOGGtzmnnLVjUehotaKnwLNGkaM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=LnriZ3FHRbBSQGV9/NvqSRX4nlrprOR0uUabTt+Bf8+u0h/o7PcNwqG3wFjb9jOnO y7TXJmaktBaLr89d0z/k9eQcbS3p3u71xnd1RvzmHYNVoVFKDGi2WbtZMl2CZtEqAq ZUhWMh7mbODl06oU3BYgQnMzNU3XA6WBBwciJlcA=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3122/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend algorithm for packet scheduler, rather than implementation (#3122)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5daa361d38022_76843f92feacd96c61740"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 22:01:05 -0000

The interesting part about the the Linux qdisc is its support for rate-based packet pacing, not it's fair queueing algorithm.  Would it help to make that more clear or provide a reference such as:

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: