IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend algorithm for packet scheduler, rather than implementation (#3122)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Fri, 18 October 2019 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 641C212085C for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.453
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.453 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gwYuC1GHocuE for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-22.smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38C18120956 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:01:01 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1571436061; bh=62RWRTnlBnDLdTm0bOGGtzmnnLVjUehotaKnwLNGkaM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=LnriZ3FHRbBSQGV9/NvqSRX4nlrprOR0uUabTt+Bf8+u0h/o7PcNwqG3wFjb9jOnO y7TXJmaktBaLr89d0z/k9eQcbS3p3u71xnd1RvzmHYNVoVFKDGi2WbtZMl2CZtEqAq ZUhWMh7mbODl06oU3BYgQnMzNU3XA6WBBwciJlcA=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6YRY7WRWGYCF775Z53W53K3EVBNHHB4VEL2Y@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3122/543971554@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3122@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3122@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend algorithm for packet scheduler, rather than implementation (#3122)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5daa361d38022_76843f92feacd96c61740"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/XZXHhjhQ7W7fp8kucghTKIb2Eec>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 22:01:05 -0000

The interesting part about the the Linux qdisc is its support for rate-based packet pacing, not it's fair queueing algorithm.  Would it help to make that more clear or provide a reference such as: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/tc-fq.8.html

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3122#issuecomment-543971554

v2.8.10 | Report a Bug | By Email