IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Robert Wilton's QPACK Comment 3 (#4802)

afrind <notifications@github.com> Tue, 26 January 2021 00:44 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5763A1A48 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:44:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=0.7, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oyajdLerr1wd for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:44:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-23.smtp.github.com (out-23.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CE213A1A49 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:44:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-ee406d2.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.19.60]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B4F566005AB for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:44:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1611621862; bh=zkxX4VyuliMbwP1BbasRmjEHV9/uycg3Kz25u71STuA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=07A28vLH455CjTs7juDekMQ62fmcHn5uAn7/8PapzC7Ru0OQ5Frz+8BVzRPmvmNZ7 uz/0g3Tc5E/UkA6ULd7JKhsETO1WlvFP4ZTxKceP790YIWyfaE9DNFGqi6E1lplC66 IWacf0jkBdBhpM8XgORoAiYP4eqO+I6EZqtMSH5E=
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:44:22 -0800
From: afrind <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5RVIYXLJQAHSHFDBF6DNDONEVBNHHC6KACPU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4802/767205456@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4802@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4802@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Robert Wilton's QPACK Comment 3 (#4802)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_600f65e6b22bc_5e1a0413285"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: afrind
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/_2WWrQRSiEbiDHT0YePwbJR8mRI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 00:44:25 -0000

Section 3.2.2 mentions that it is an error to attempt to insert an entry larger than the table size: 

> It is an error if the encoder attempts to add an entry that is larger than the dynamic table capacity; the decoder MUST treat this as a connection error of type QPACK_ENCODER_STREAM_ERROR.

I can't actually find a place where the document says that if you fail to decode an instruction or reference (for any reason, which would include exceeding implementation limits) that it's an error.  I think we might need one.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4802#issuecomment-767205456

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email