Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some examples (#1454)

Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Wed, 26 August 2020 11:09 UTC

Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 04:09:31 -0700
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7UAOSSBYAZJ42WAZN5KIR6XEVBNHHBHWAMHE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1454/680813912@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1454@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1454@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some examples (#1454)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f4642ebb05a8_71281964114199"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/c0c-oIAnorTuqhqBzfQz2t80yB4>

As a recent implementer, I found the offline QPACK tests very useful. 

I don't know if textual examples are a good idea. There's a challenge to make them clear, concise and complete. But if you're going to add some, then perhaps also think about including one with "out of order delivery" where HEADERS arrive before their required inserts.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1454#issuecomment-680813912

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… Lucas Pardue
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… Lars Eggert
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… afrind
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… Lucas Pardue
[quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some example… afrind
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… afrind
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… Mike Bishop
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… afrind