Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some examples (#1454)
Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Wed, 26 August 2020 11:09 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3838F3A0EF2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 04:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pX8sZFH2idaS for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 04:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-21.smtp.github.com (out-21.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8893A3A0EF0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 04:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-0eea13f.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-0eea13f.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.109.26]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C068252074D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 04:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1598440171; bh=4a9S0843oJO0AStjZHOepXmJYi1qIVe6vMF0awofCqw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=vXLNpO6MYnhhzU7IeEOe03LJmmEVX+tnUqoCYpkKKZkAZH2zQxoATxVqpwa0XGcEc Nif0spcIH0F71wI7hToBXf2i5A2HvRdzzF2EsZJ4S8W8lV9lomvgIo2k0FdO4noFHM 7VT7TwowpPok0P5lg24pv+apsf5QhOp+WqM9h9AE=
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 04:09:31 -0700
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7UAOSSBYAZJ42WAZN5KIR6XEVBNHHBHWAMHE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1454/680813912@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1454@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1454@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some examples (#1454)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f4642ebb05a8_71281964114199"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/c0c-oIAnorTuqhqBzfQz2t80yB4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 11:09:34 -0000
As a recent implementer, I found the offline QPACK tests very useful. I don't know if textual examples are a good idea. There's a challenge to make them clear, concise and complete. But if you're going to add some, then perhaps also think about including one with "out of order delivery" where HEADERS arrive before their required inserts. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1454#issuecomment-680813912
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… Lucas Pardue
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… Lucas Pardue
- [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some example… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… afrind
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] QPACK could use some exa… afrind