Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTO in handshake in recovery draft (#3467)

mirjak <> Mon, 17 February 2020 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23F812084C for <>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:53:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.383
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DocttmjnqwP7 for <>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3DBB120838 for <>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:53:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:53:03 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1581961983; bh=FsOM+fFWDcY6hDMviAik034ORJp58aWA8wKPORG5MyI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=sAUs6PJoMal/AvmmeWyMKKSAcM6ScYuU/mnqt2l5t4IRyeGLVVGTdTC0ybR9yR69h YQ0vQSn661H7r6XyXkQDj2XnRpxg4fbK5FEbfyeIGd8mjSIH48LIBlkPOHTl5PQGzl BLTVkoXXxVKUOQyXaxJaooys26wUayeLBLFraGLo=
From: mirjak <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3467/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] RTO in handshake in recovery draft (#3467)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e4ad2ff17693_40293fc51d2cd964330853"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mirjak
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 17:53:06 -0000

I also just noticed that there is this sentence in the "sending probe packets" section:
"   Alternatively, instead of sending an ack-eliciting packet, the sender
   MAY mark any packets still in flight as lost."

and this sentence in the next "detection loss" section:
"   A PTO timer expiration event does not indicate packet loss and MUST
   NOT cause prior unacknowledged packets to be marked as lost."

So maybe that first sentence should have be removed as well? Not sure what is intended here...?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: