Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A day in the life (#3225)

MikkelFJ <> Tue, 12 November 2019 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBD112006E for <>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:52:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8_LzmDDcQpv4 for <>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:52:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBD39120033 for <>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:51:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:51:25 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1573566685; bh=quf9gqLGvIFZKLu4/IfUXcxkho+iaLrgsB7/hTDrYss=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Rm2TlThxin6lhCQA9jFHwY5Na2kQATs4QNRUIEMyjRcnHz0+AK46jsspS0kGLee6w vQybj3C0Tc+H1q5SvQb74xmU6LBkbFMcjSTFm6RU5FnXwo0PoOTRl3D+9r0jlsr5zd mjSTZfCFsr2ajWtGiuZ0h97NNpsQl75m9t2V40G0=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3225/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] A day in the life (#3225)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5dcab8ddb19b7_3c1d3fd6956cd968175837a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:52:19 -0000

mikkelfj commented on this pull request.

> +Each connection starts with a handshake phase, during which client and server
+establish a shared secret using the cryptographic handshake protocol
+{{QUIC-TLS}} and negotiate the application protocol.  The handshake
+({{handshake}}) confirms that endpoints are willing to communicate
+({{validate-handshake}}) and establishes parameters for the connection
+An application protocol can also operate in a limited fashion during the
+handshake phase.  0-RTT allows application messages to be sent by a client
+before receiving any messages from the server.  However, 0-RTT lacks certain key
+security guarantees. In particular, there is no protection against replay
+attacks in 0-RTT; see {{QUIC-TLS}}.  Separately, a server can also send
+application data to a client before it receives the final cryptographic
+handshake messages that allow it to confirm the identity and liveness of the
+client.  These capabilities allow an application protocol to offer the option to
+trade some security guarantees for improved latency.

This section reads as if 1-RTT could be relaxed while it probably only intends to address 0-RTT.  See also #3224

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: