Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove PRIORITY (#2922)

Kazuho Oku <> Mon, 22 July 2019 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C814E120045 for <>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3U2Pqu_u5tcP for <>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20172120048 for <>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:06:38 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1563836798; bh=vExK0SM5oS7VumYfxrNJWL4Byb4vmzKG3H4AVJS+dho=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Y3I3xanBshI/Lgtk3iIRRoDdihIgtev0zHFueq73twMIrMlSI/Dwl4iohjlHTGJuo FU3eBKZCJ8BwElOQkpLUoSmbTLqQCuN3wdDx8tb6EDoWm7Pbdp1dSRavXwO3qKHraK 9/LwYiiPI7kCMbo7J0yyC9kHhtCKvc29DOkYSzss=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2922/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Remove PRIORITY (#2922)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d36417edc63b_33403fb0efccd960110561c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:06:42 -0000

> In essence, I feel that if we remove tree-based priorities, we **must endorse another solution** (e.g., patrick meenan's setup, kazuho's http-header based solution) and **standardize that alongside H3**.

I also think we should have a prioritization scheme before or when we deploy H3 in the wild, but process-wise, I think we should separate the discussion so as to minimize the chance of QUIC standardization process getting delayed, and because server-driven prioritization can work as a backup strategy.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: