IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP nitpick: checkng for maximum Push ID (#4052)

Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Tue, 25 August 2020 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFD23A0F19 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 08:47:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.153
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.153 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.048, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AkUxgpITm3-m for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 08:47:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-25.smtp.github.com (out-25.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E2DD3A0ED9 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 08:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-2e54e43.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-2e54e43.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.27]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C85D840048 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2020 08:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1598370432; bh=hkp0mTqQwT4u3/YLzxi3Wqp2N8sXe+6byQXxg+mwnI0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=A608w49b4ZNKjmpWom8X9IxftLkJtXycBQNAow0Gh9KmuJYQGlmSQ6hFDawQK2iWb xkk6sbRgmKWlesxnwkUcbyBfKBx7FoC8LQkqIgTvxvcXILGAnIlegHerCtp+qZYqzk dASfjtNMGXTPj46RrhAyHeeayNjZS8FX2eaRYPNA=
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 08:47:12 -0700
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6TTDU2ORJM7ZRBLSF5KEJYBEVBNHHCRXIK2Q@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4052/680107843@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4052@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4052@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP nitpick: checkng for maximum Push ID (#4052)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f4532808d748_6dc81964931fb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/gRhmIOxwxRNrqaHrNN-EK8azcDo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:47:17 -0000

There is some other text that kinda marks the error case:

```
  The maximum Push ID is unset when a connection is created, meaning
  that a server cannot push until it receives a MAX_PUSH_ID frame.
```

One interpretation is that since any value of ID is greater than `unset`, then the error condition holds. But I agree with Dmitri that we could probably make this clearer with some editorializing.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4052#issuecomment-680107843

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email