Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unspecified how a server sends Handshake packets during / after migration (#3142)

ianswett <> Thu, 24 October 2019 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C945012010D for <>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 19:36:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pHOBfsGy0rMh for <>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 19:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6713F120124 for <>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 19:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 19:36:29 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1571884589; bh=EuncSjwKwR0q4a7sEYFnxKrJvWMAgBHkUguBs35QR3s=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=F6BhJ56mvjw9NXkV3JCRIh4N/98q8wxCWHkEhEViDBscksF5TcCmfh+VqhDm/hjxL c9YhTFG2q34+SLSoKXvg71QsKVJdYuOHRYcj/1IrkMOrVCR/UH7oK1Tm7x51Uz7q1/ LMKC67lBkclnwn7Zf+UokRnK5zwV1uAQK0cHGlao=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3142/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] It is unspecified how a server sends Handshake packets during / after migration (#3142)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db10e2d8f7fa_32af3ff25f8cd96c1816da"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 02:36:32 -0000

I think there is a key principle we've previously agreed upon.

The 5-tuple doesn't change during the handshake.  That means we should not send Handshake packets down the new path.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: