Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap to Packet Number Offset (#1307)
Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com> Thu, 19 April 2018 23:45 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65485126D0C for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iafQeMsFORoU for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4869A126CE8 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:45:05 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1524181505; bh=22ocm7wG+d8ok/9rpdxj3XYpQjsIUXHo868QtRpNtgE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=RBcevIoHJCkqwUdLKwY34a1Jpizw8SYR+pFItd1IhcO//VsD6dmv2xYVV0BZHH3Gi NMOnA16MaBDZqGCUteTmeqd92rRoHjcp/8IvPYmyzLv4ZZjbZ2MEz9XC5Fx03zEhg8 OOzN4VlMNJXswXip2f1KeOybB04ln+GABJWVxDZQ=
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abbd74ad3e67a39e4e0c8b0710bf88d3766154198a92cf0000000116f0ec0192a169ce12d68139@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1307/review/113813136@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1307@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1307@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap to Packet Number Offset (#1307)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ad92a012bef5_37352aec34adcf506349b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/i8IKpNzWfejoz3l_oYYFejUj_Ww>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 23:45:08 -0000
marten-seemann commented on this pull request.
> @@ -832,6 +832,27 @@ Use of a secure random number generator {{?RFC4086}} is not necessary for
generating the initial packet number, nor is it necessary that the value be
uniformly distributed.
+### New Connection ID Packet Numbers
+
+Packets with with new connection IDs have special rules for encoding the packet
+number in the headers. They use an offset (see {{packet-number-offset}}) to
+transform the packet number via the following:
Why does this only apply to new connection IDs? Wouldn't it be easier to apply this transformation to every packet number?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/1307#pullrequestreview-113813136
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap to … Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… Antoine Delignat-Lavaud
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… Antoine Delignat-Lavaud
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… Nick Banks
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Change Packet Number Gap… Nick Banks