IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless Reset packet sizes should not depend on the maximum connection ID length (#2869)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Mon, 08 July 2019 10:26 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152A8120167 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 03:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xcbegS1fFDrH for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 03:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-7.smtp.github.com (out-7.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84F8A120158 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 03:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 03:26:47 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1562581607; bh=dfbr78Rhm0UKP77YSnmfmeLt/qVHtPGqKwdaJdPkCyk=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=EzknKS/AJzM0ZX2RLB32fOc+2IUy0egy8G3NX/w4a1PgL+xDegwnPExTNWxiwyQdC hJbPnZtDivtvw4VwQuvzZTILJMttrDPbwIJlMLwT4Z31tcexQaYS1QWOQd/o0dvjxe mEEYJl4K8wsRPOIbp/CZEnrxIBIPYsU7K/foXoQw=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZEZVXIIGVKFSY3QIF3GBGOPEVBNHHBXHYKMI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2869/509170795@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2869@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2869@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Stateless Reset packet sizes should not depend on the maximum connection ID length (#2869)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d231a6753ef2_6e253fa9888cd9642428087"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/jUsowC8_PWyBYMSg2oSs43UvuWM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 10:27:00 -0000

I also agree that not recognizing resets is the goal, but I don't think we're currently achieving that for reasons stated above.  And as David pointed out, I think there are allowed behaviors that would not elicit a stateless reset when you'd really like to have one sent.

Why maxcid length, not mincid length if we're trying to establish the lower bound on the packet size that could have been sent previously in the connection?  Either way, mincid+19 works for me, since I'm mostly concerned about cases with 0, or small fixed CID lengths.




-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2869#issuecomment-509170795

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email