Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a non-probing migration when no CIDs are available (#4788)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Wed, 20 January 2021 23:49 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB283A15F5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:49:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.258
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.258 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ImBawoA2uIS7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:49:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-18.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C030C3A15F2 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:49:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-3a60f09.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.113.73]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C8C2D340D5B for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:49:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1611186562; bh=KEDHViXntj7q1NOuAfDyBIE+DWyANA/wi8Tga1aAmFE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=1jJGMizaP7IolY2rguhBzkBa8qETKeWqmH3GMTqwUNvpPOFtMpn3gB2CHWe34AXAr 3koJ/vVlBDaX7T9LViLQPRxR6108WIRp2E22KNGpV+3Vdw7tTy/iThcPa6B2Wd7usY O8WFslbXOQpvIinFy9KZhpTt/XVprobAknDskM5I=
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:49:22 -0800
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK6D76GRF23ZMGZDSWV6CSRIFEVBNHHC6HBMWU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4788/764036081@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4788@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4788@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a non-probing migration when no CIDs are available (#4788)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_6008c182c613e_581a0418065"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/jfblNXqZfk6On92qRlphAR1Y40A>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 23:49:25 -0000
It may also be worth clarifying that if the peer migrates and doesn't change CID, either it's already linkable or not, so there's not point in changing CID in response. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4788#issuecomment-764036081
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a non-pr… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a no… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a no… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a no… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a no… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a no… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a no… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a no… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a no… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a no… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a no… mjoras
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a no… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a no… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify response to a no… Jana Iyengar