Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] STOP_SENDING in Ready state (#1797)

Ryan Hamilton <notifications@github.com> Thu, 15 November 2018 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE577128D09 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 11:21:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9FCvuCz81-rs for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 11:21:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D64C4127333 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 11:21:52 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 11:21:51 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1542309711; bh=PwVz3TVPzo4pTddI2grn6tjcx/icLvkeR5uFDe3Ah+k=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=i1sn+pmkuCDS7lCiGIhN7Mo4mQOu6emyE8MjNjypUVuwXXcFENkjMTNu+tFjhGmXp a55rq4HBVW7e4FXT1WNmxfFZTfkNwdAwbX3cHSzk2+7uxxYN1zmzz+IXjl3enplvT0 q4vFOyZqtMlkVog/Zdw303VuGgkwTaP6BnMtknXw=
From: Ryan Hamilton <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab73bc6da10b961442fda60d4e749f483199c3b53a92cf000000011805894f92a169ce15ad130f@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1797/439159062@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1797@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1797@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] STOP_SENDING in Ready state (#1797)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bedc74f74a2d_36903fc691ad45c0789f8"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: RyanAtGoogle
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/mOlT5_mCkWHBt-otsKBL_o8RFXw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 19:21:55 -0000

"I would say the overall desired behavior is that the initiator of a stream must be the first one to send frames on it, but that any frame it chooses to send should be considered valid, regardless of reordering."

"The other way to frame it is that a peer-initiated stream moves out of Ready on receipt of any frame, and the prohibition on STOP_SENDING gets scoped to locally-initiated streams."

@MikeBishop well said. I completely agree with both framings of this issue.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1797#issuecomment-439159062