Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference algorithm can produce invalid values (#2112)

Bence Béky <notifications@github.com> Sun, 23 December 2018 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19511277D2 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 13:12:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.085
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.085 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DZRnQgRf_bOx for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 13:12:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B6EF126CC7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 13:12:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 13:12:09 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1545599529; bh=xbwncUp/B+pHUJZ1Whb0lUuMB6bml6E/FrpWuOcNRg0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Xfv1HNK6tSY+/wBjIq+EmkF5PvjUO3x9gGcLATkfKP1H8H46I3te6wMCDWKA+FryL UOF6pOO9jY5QA9M0B92hZpei92ZxahHa/3B8fn+DZnGIi2+bpFScFigV4bVFQqIul2 L+rRMCeJye4+yalKc8kkTcBozwWH7qN2T03g/bZM=
From: Bence Béky <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab0d67ccfdedea92368e4573f7c9b9b6958f36351a92cf000000011837bc2992a169ce17393bf8@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2112/449663516@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2112@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2112@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest Reference algorithm can produce invalid values (#2112)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c1ffa29b25a7_586a3ffa1f4d45b464410"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: bencebeky
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/mUP2TjzFBZSQR0KUGfYhd1grSxw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 21:12:12 -0000

> An encoder using index 18 when the decoder is at 2 and ME is 10 is doing something illegal per the current spec. The maximum index is 12. The decoder needs to make this a connection error - or you are suggesting we should relax the rule about allowing evicting unacknowledged headers?

I like the idea of making it a connection error.  https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2249

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2112#issuecomment-449663516