Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Short header reserved bits: make available for unilateral experimentation (#2022)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Tue, 20 November 2018 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA97F128766 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:12:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JBZL2xon4v2V for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:12:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF30D124BE5 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:12:04 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 18:12:04 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1542679924; bh=ItMKHirEfVoDz3I5CAhHqb+P3J5UGm5F4PW+sVZ9tBM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=nEyC1Uv6Okhr8D+FY1o86oXOYUGSQGhI9BlESqVPdi3TjMN28zlyqBzYHSPYEQonG UIr3Z2/aLR9J3TyxJKfbjI+EiYhnh2hVfCBPAPn8wRMdOGa9ZeayONh+myTuGUoQGM wdkvI/JRxzbwfnxaiaZLPG1OA8dw9y4NJoBHoak4=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab83ae82f10527e4cf9ba7cde4307905357faaec6692cf00000001180b2f7492a169ce16cbfdb7@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2022/440111320@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2022@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2022@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Short header reserved bits: make available for unilateral experimentation (#2022)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bf36d74190b5_6c203ff2eb4d45b836595e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/nB_su5rl7viZUZ5ggdSCooTu2MY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 02:12:07 -0000

I don't advocate for this, but if it happens, the random greasing should just be the header protection mask, otherwise it gets expensive and additional PRNG as was pointed out earlier in the discussion.

I'd rather see text where the bits are are zeroed and masked by default, but endpoints can negotiate masked or unmasked use via extensions. (Or masked only if people are concerned with ossification).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2022#issuecomment-440111320