Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred_address and NEW_CONNECTION_ID (#3560)

David Schinazi <> Thu, 09 April 2020 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F0F3A0D57 for <>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 10:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.649
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.168, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kAa2T0pYsHoP for <>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 10:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5398F3A0D38 for <>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 10:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 10:24:19 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1586453059; bh=2Of5Y1nm4GVw3Ll9EfkU5opIwToGKZ7qBgwi6QyiX4c=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=2Mqc8SVMMXLgYNYKOKXnneuaFu5PlC8GIIFAarmLQkToIMpnSCsUuz8drtVY+hzdY KnytzElxZttYFWLa0lMTXN73HTkan0YzrOpHFpsOjh2RYs8KafS8U3iV0lfgDfikVn wQrHXknBf9KIS8FlLsqe638jVmDOtqTeKoGkhnCE=
From: David Schinazi <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3560/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Equivalence of preferred_address and NEW_CONNECTION_ID (#3560)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e8f5a434b887_1afa3ff0950cd968266387"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 17:24:22 -0000

Thanks for the details @ianswett and @martinthomson. I get a sense I might be trying to re-litigate  past consensus without providing new information, so I'll back down. I do think that the ghost of hypothetical linkability has caused us to make some very odd design choices, but this isn't new to this issue/PR. In the end, this is the kind of feature that can be enabled by extensions so I can live with us further restricting the base spec for consistency.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: